Creen AI — free multi-model studio for video, image and audio

• Creen AI

  This page

  PricingCreen AI leads

  • Free daily generations on the lighter image and video models
  • Premium engines such as the flagship video tiers draw on credits instead
  • No payment details needed to start, and no account required at all for the free path

• Runway

  PricingCreen AI leads

  • A free plan with a one-off credit grant
  • Paid tiers scale by monthly credit allowance, with a high-end unlimited-style plan
  • Commercial use is tied to the plan you are on

• Google Flow

  PricingCreen AI leads

  • Free credits on a Google account
  • Higher limits and the premium video models sit behind Google AI subscription tiers
  • Bundled with a broader AI subscription rather than sold on its own

1. Creen AI — official site
2. Creen AI — model lineup
3. Creen AI — plans and credits
4. Creen AI — FAQ
5. Creen AI — about and operating entity
6. Creen AI — terms of use
7. Creen AI for iOS — App Store listing
8. Creen AI for Android — Play Store listing
9. Runway — official site
10. Google Flow — official site

Free tier

Yes

Pricing summary

The structure is a free tier with a credit-paid ceiling rather than a subscription wall. On the free side you get daily generations on the lighter image and video engines — the publisher’s own framing is that a free allowance is generous enough to iterate a full design cycle before you ever touch a credit — and nothing about that path requires an account, an email address or payment details. When you want the front-tier engines, the ones carrying the recognisable model names, those draw on credits you buy rather than on the free allowance. That is the honest shape to plan around: the free tier is not a crippled demo, it is a real working allowance on a subset of models, and the upgrade is about access to specific engines rather than about removing an artificial block. Because both the allowance sizes and the credit rates move with model releases and provider pricing, the numbers are best read on the official plans page rather than quoted second-hand; what is stable is the two-tier shape and the fact that you can evaluate the product without paying or registering.

Reviewed on 19 September 2026 · Creen AI — plans and credits

• A model roster rather than a model

  The headline number is 40+ frontier models in one tab, and it decomposes into roughly 28 video engines, 11 image models and 7 audio models. The video side is where the roster is deepest and where it matters most, because video engines differ far more from each other than image models do — a prompt that produces confident camera movement in one returns a static scene in another. Having the choice in a dropdown is the product; the models themselves belong to other companies.

• Text to video and image to video in the same flow

  You can start from a written scene or from a still you already have. The text-to-video path takes a prompt and returns a short clip; the image-to-video path animates a photograph from a description of the motion rather than from keyframes, which is the more immediately useful of the two for anyone with existing assets — product shots, portraits, property listings and archive photography all become motion without a shoot.

• Output ceilings that are stated plainly

  Stills go up to 4K, and clips run to roughly ten seconds at 1080p and 24fps. Those are honest short-form numbers rather than a claim to cinematic length, and the practical reading is that this is a tool for social, advertising, storyboards and pre-visualisation rather than for long-form film. Where the studio goes beyond the basics is control: seed values are exposed so a result can be reproduced, and prompts accept multiple reference images together with weighting and negative terms.

• Audio and voice models alongside the visuals

  Seven audio models cover text-to-speech, voice cloning and dubbing, which matters more than it sounds in an aggregated studio. Most short-form work needs a voice track and most parallel tools leave you to source it elsewhere; having speech synthesis and dubbing in the same workspace means a draft clip can come out finished enough to review rather than needing a second tool before anyone can judge it.

• A gallery to start from when you have no prompt

  The home page leads with a community feed of recent generations, each carrying the model and settings that produced it, and any of them can be re-run as a starting point. That is a genuinely different entry into the product from a blank prompt box: instead of guessing what an engine is capable of, you find a result you like, see what it was made with, and adjust from there.

• Adjacent tools beyond plain generation

  The studio carries a set of narrower tools alongside the main generators: AI motion control for directing movement in a shot, image-to-image, an outfit-swap tool, an AI image enhancer, and a video editor that sits next to the image, video and audio modes in the workspace. None of them is the reason to arrive, but together they keep a small project inside one tab instead of scattering it across four subscriptions.

• No account required to start, on the web and on mobile

  The FAQ is explicit that you can begin generating without registering, and that creating an account is what unlocks saving projects and managing a library of work. That ordering is the useful part: the free path asks for nothing, and the account appears only when you want persistence. The same product ships as an iOS and an Android app, so the workflow is not locked to a browser.

1. 1

   Look at the gallery before you write anything

   The fastest way in is not the prompt box. The community feed shows finished results with the model and settings that produced them, so the sensible first move is to find something close to what you have in mind and re-run it. That converts an abstract question — which engine should I use for this? — into a concrete comparison, and it gives you working prompt language instead of a blank field.

2. 2

   Decide whether you are starting from words or from an image

   It is worth being deliberate about this, because it changes the whole job. If you are generating something that does not exist yet, go text to video or text to image. If you already have the asset — a product photo, a portrait, a still from a previous generation — go straight to image to video and describe only the motion you want. Animating an existing image is usually the shorter path to something usable.

3. 3

   Run the same prompt across two or three engines before you judge it

   This is the habit the product is built for and the one most people skip. A first result tells you about the engine, not about your prompt. Re-run it on a different model in the dropdown and the differences become obvious — motion confidence, texture, how literally the prompt is read — which is information you cannot get from any single-vendor tool, and it is what stops you committing to the wrong subscription later.

4. 4

   Use the settings once you have a direction

   When a result is close but not there, the controls are the same ones an artist would reach for: keep the seed so you can change one variable at a time, add reference images when you want a specific look carried across, use weighting to push a prompt element up or down, and add negatives to remove something that keeps appearing. Changing several of these at once makes it impossible to tell what worked.

5. 5

   Stack stills into motion, then export

   The multiplier is compositional: generate a still at 4K, send it to image-to-video to animate, add a voice track from the audio models, and download. Doing that inside one workspace instead of three is where the practical time saving sits, particularly on a batch of small assets for a campaign or a listing set.

• Short-form creators working to a daily cadence

  Ten-second 1080p clips and free daily generations on the lighter models is a deliberate fit for Reels, Shorts and TikTok volume — enough output to keep a posting schedule without a per-clip invoice, and enough control via seeds and references to keep a series looking consistent across posts rather than improvised each time.

• Designers and art directors comparing engines

  The comparison use case is the strongest argument for the product. Running one art-directed prompt through several video engines in a single tab tells you more about which service is worth a subscription than a month of reading reviews, and the studio replaces the alternative of signing up for three trials, learning three interfaces and canceling two of them.

• E-commerce and marketing teams producing asset volume

  Product stills, lifestyle scenes and short loops are the bread and butter of a small marketing team, and the image-to-video path turns an existing catalogue photograph into motion without a shoot. Because the free tier does not require accounts or payment details, a team can evaluate output quality against real product imagery before anyone commits to a plan.

• People who need a voice track with their visuals

  Having seven audio models for speech, dubbing and voice work next to the generators is what makes the studio useful for explainers, adverts and localisation, where the video is only half the deliverable. Producing both halves in one workspace removes the step where a draft clip sits waiting for audio before anyone can review it.

• Anyone testing AI video before paying for it

  If you have not yet decided whether AI generation belongs in your workflow, a studio with a free tier and no sign-up is the cheapest possible experiment. You can produce real assets against a real brief, on models that are not the flagship ones but are not toy models either, and decide on evidence rather than on a vendor’s demo reel.

An aggregator, not a model developer

Creen does not train or own the engines it offers. It hosts third-party models behind one interface, which is why the roster can move quickly and why the flagship names change when providers ship new versions. The practical consequence is that model availability can vary by region and by demand, and that a specific engine appearing in this overview is a statement about a moment rather than a commitment.

The roster at review time

The publisher advertises 40+ frontier models, which at review time broke down as roughly 28 video engines, 11 image models and 7 audio models. The video group is the deepest and carries most of the recognisable names in the space; the image group covers photorealistic through illustration styles; the audio group is built around speech, dubbing and voice work. Separately, the publisher markets a large library of styles and inspiration presets for steering output.

Output ceilings and generation times

Stills render up to 4K, and video tops out around ten seconds at 1080p and 24fps. Image generations typically return in seconds rather than minutes, while the image-to-video path takes longer — the publisher quotes tens of seconds rather than single digits. Requests queue in parallel rather than strictly one at a time, so a batch of comparisons can be in flight together, though the per-model figures are the publisher’s own and worth treating as indicative.

Web, iOS and Android from one account

The studio runs in the browser and also ships as apps on both mobile platforms. The web path is the one that needs no account for free generation; signing in is what adds saved projects and a managed asset library, and that account is what carries across surfaces. Anyone evaluating the tool for a team should read the plans page rather than assume the free tier scales to a group.

The company behind it

Creen AI is operated by CODESAIL LIMITED, a Hong Kong company, with a published business address in Kwun Tong and support handled by email. That is worth knowing for two reasons: the entity and jurisdiction are what any commercial or procurement question resolves against, and the studio is a young product from a small company rather than a division of an established platform, which is the relevant context when deciding how much of a workflow to build on it.

What it is not

Not a video editor in the professional sense — there is a video editor in the workspace, but no timeline craft, grading or audio mixing to match one. Not a single-vendor tool with published throughput guarantees or service commitments. And not a licensing specialist: the terms sit with the operator, so anyone delivering client work should read them directly rather than rely on a summary, including one on this page.